Beekeeping in Baringo and Kitui Counties Comparative Analysis
Kenya’s apiculture sector holds great promise, especially in regions
where ecological conditions and community engagement are favorable. Among the
most significant contributors to this sector are Baringo and Kitui
counties. Each presents a unique case: Baringo excels in structured production
and output, while Kitui leads in hive ownership and grassroots participation.
Hive Ownership and Density
Hive density—the number of hives per 1,000 residents—is a useful metric
for gauging the intensity of beekeeping in a region. Verified data show that
Kitui leads nationally in this regard.
|
Hive Count |
Population (2019) |
Hive Density
(Hives/1,000 People) |
|
|
Kitui |
383,554 (Munyao et al., 2015) |
1,136,187 (KNBS, 2020) |
337 |
|
Baringo |
154,388 (KIPPRA, 2023) |
666,763 (KNBS, 2020) |
232 |
Kitui’s high hive density reflects extensive household-level engagement
in beekeeping, while Baringo also shows strong regional participation.
Honey Production Volumes
Although Kitui has more hives, Baringo outpaces it significantly in
reported honey production. According to the Baringo County Integrated
Development Plan (CIDP 2023–2027), Baringo produced 882 metric tons of honey in
2022, the highest figure recorded at county level in Kenya.
|
Honey Production
(2022) |
Notes |
|
|
Baringo |
882 metric tons |
Highest reported output in Kenya |
|
Kitui |
Not recently published |
Active region; lacks up-to-date
official data |
This discrepancy suggests that Baringo’s average yield per hive is likely
higher, possibly due to hive type, better forage conditions, and stronger
institutional support.
Ecology and Forage Sources
Both counties are located in Kenya’s semi-arid belt and benefit from
favorable floral diversity that supports honeybee populations.
|
County |
Ecological Profile |
Dominant Nectar
Sources |
|
Baringo |
Acacia-dominated
savannah |
Acacia tortilis, Terminalia brownii, Croton megalocarpus |
|
Kitui |
Dryland shrubland
and forest pockets |
Acacia spp., Commiphora africana, Croton spp. |
These ecosystems allow for consistent nectar flow during rainy seasons
and offer excellent conditions for natural, unadulterated honey production.
Hive Technology and Training
Technological practices differ significantly between the two counties.
Kitui has historically relied on traditional log hives, while Baringo has
experienced gradual modernization.
|
County |
Dominant Hive Type |
Modernization
Support |
|
Kitui |
Over 98%
traditional hives (Munyao et al., 2015) |
Supported by FAO,
NGOs, county extension programs |
|
Baringo |
Mix of traditional
and improved hives |
KVDA, Heifer
International, and county programs |
In Kitui, various interventions have introduced Langstroth and top-bar
hives, though uptake remains modest. Affognon et al. (2015) found that modern
hives in the former Mwingi District (now Kitui) significantly increased yield
and efficiency. Baringo, on the other hand, began adopting improved hives as
early as the 1980s through support from national and international partners,
leading to more widespread acceptance of hive technology.
Honey Quality and Market Access
Both counties produce honey that meets international standards. A 2019
study published in the Italian Journal of Food Safety found that samples
from Kitui and Baringo complied with East African, Codex, and European
Union regulations. Acacia was the predominant pollen source in most
samples, indicating high purity and floral consistency.
On the market side, Kitui has taken a decentralized, cooperative-based
approach. According to the Maarifa Centre (2022), the county has established at
least 16 honey processing plants since 2015. Kamaki Beekeepers Cooperative in
Ikutha, for instance, has improved its selling price from KSh 80 to over
KSh 1,000 per kilogram due to better quality control and branding.
Baringo has a more institutionalized market structure. The Kerio Valley Development Authority (KVDA) supports honey aggregation, processing, and direct marketing. The county government has also been instrumental in establishing collection centers and linking cooperatives with buyers.
References
Chat with us
